Conservative Social Re-Engineering is a threat to our country
(The Paul Ryan's Budget in particular based on the Negative Liberty i.e., virtue of selfishness
of Libertarian Goddess AynRand)
Putting the Government on a straight jacket, 18% of GDP or less in spending would wipe out government agencies and civil rights legislation passed since 1960. This is an attempt to do what is described below, devastate 20th century progressive progress in America
At stake is the moral basis of America.
The individual issues are all too real: assaults on unions, public employees, women's rights, immigrants, the environment, health care, voting rights, food safety, pensions, prenatal care, science, public broadcasting, and on and on. Budget deficits are a ruse, as we've seen in Wisconsin, where the governor turned a surplus into a deficit by providing corporate tax breaks, and then used the deficit as a ploy to break the unions, not just in Wisconsin, but seeking to be the first domino in a nationwide conservative movement.
Deficits can be addressed by raising revenue, plugging tax loopholes, putting people to work, and developing the economy long-term in all the ways the president has discussed. But deficits are not what really matters to conservatives.
Conservatives really want to change the basis of American life, re-enginer America,
to make America run according to the conservative moral worldview
in all areas of life.
In the 2008 campaign, candidate Obama accurately described the basis
of American democracy: Empathy citizens caring for each other,
both social and personal responsibility acting on that care, and
an ethic of excellence. From these, our freedoms and our way of
life follow, as does the role of government: to protect and empower
everyone equally. Protection includes safety, health, the environment,
pensions and empowerment starts with education and infrastructure.
No one can be free without these, and without a commitment to care
and act on that care by one's fellow citizens.
The conservative worldview rejects all of that.
Conservatives believe in individual responsibility alone, not social
responsibility. They don't think government should help its citizens.
That is, they don't think citizens should help each other.
The part of government they want to cut is not the military
(we have 174 bases around the world), not government subsidies to
corporations, not the aspect of government that fits their worldview.
They want to cut the part that helps people. Why? Because that
violates individual responsibility.
But where does that view of individual responsibility alone come
from? see more on ( http://kvs.co/8l0U )
The way to understand the conservative moral system is to consider a strict father family. The father is The Decider, the ultimate moral authority in the family. His authority must not be challenged. His job is to protect the family, to support the family (by winning competitions in the marketplace), and to teach his kids right from wrong by disciplining them physically when they do wrong. The use of force is necessary and required. Only then will children develop the internal discipline to become moral beings. And only with such discipline will they be able to prosper. And what of people who are not prosperous? They don't have discipline, and without discipline they cannot be moral, so they deserve their poverty. The good people are hence the prosperous people. Helping
others takes away their discipline, and hence makes them both unable
to prosper on their own and function morally.
The market itself is seen in this way. The slogan, "Let the market decide" assumes the market itself is The Decider. The market is seen as both natural (since it is assumed that people naturally seek their self-interest) and moral (if everyone seeks their
own profit, the profit of all will be maximized by the invisible hand). As the ultimate moral authority, there should be no power higher than the market that might go against market values. Thus the government can spend money to protect the market and promote market values, but should not rule over it either through (1) regulation, (2) taxation, (3) unions and worker rights, (4) environmental protection or food safety laws, and (5) tort cases. Moreover, government should not do public service. The market has service industries for that. Thus, it would be wrong for the government to provide health care, education, public broadcasting, public parks, and so on. The very idea of these things is at odds with the conservative moral system. No one should be paying for anyone else. It is individual responsibility in all arenas. Taxation is thus seen as taking money away from those who have earned it and giving it to people who don't deserve it. Taxation cannot be seen as providing the necessities of life, a civilized society, and as necessary for business to prosper. Furthermore, Conservatives totally ignore the preamble of the Constitution as regarding "domestic tranquility" and "promoting (enhancing) common welfare" so for them anything other than defense is "Unconstitutional"
In conservative family life, the strict father rules. Fathers and husbands should have control over reproduction; hence, parental and spousal notification laws and opposition to abortion.
In conservative religion, God is seen as the strict father, the Lord, who rewards and punishes according to individual responsibility in following his Biblical word.
Above all, the authority of conservatism itself must be maintained. The country should be ruled by conservative values, and progressive values are seen as evil. Science should not have authority over the market, and so the science of global warming and evolution must be denied.
Facts that are inconsistent with the authority of conservatism must be ignored or denied or explained away. To protect and extend conservative values themselves, the devil's own means can be used again conservatism's immoral enemies, whether lies, intimidation, torture, or even death, say, for women's doctors.
Freedom is defined as being your own strict father with individual not social responsibility, and without any government authority telling you what you can and cannot do. To defend that freedom as an individual, you will of course need a gun.
This is the America that conservatives really want. Budget deficits are convenient ruses for destroying American democracy and replacing it with conservative rule in all areas of life.
What is saddest of all is to see Democrats helping them.
Democrats help radical conservatives by accepting the deficit frame and arguing about what to cut. Even arguing against specific "cuts" is working within the conservative frame. What is the alternative? Pointing out what conservatives really want. Point out that there is plenty of money in America, and in Wisconsin. It is at the top. The disparity in financial assets is un-American the top one percent has more financial assets than the bottom 95 percent. Middle class wages have been flat for 30 years, while the wealth has floated to the top. This fits the conservative way of life, but not the American way of life. Democrats help conservatives by not shouting out loud over and over that it was conservative values that caused the global economic collapse: lack of regulation and a greed-is-good ethic (AynRand).
Democrats also help conservatives by what a friend has called Democratic Communication Disorder. Republican conservatives have constructed a vast and effective communication system, with think tanks, framing experts, training institutes, a system of trained speakers, vast holdings of media, and booking agents. Eighty percent of the talking heads on TV are conservatives. Talk matters because language heard over and over changes brains. Democrats have not built the communication system they need, and many are relatively clueless about how to frame their deepest values and complex truths. Read this on Conservative Higher Education Indoctrination on Greed/Virtue Of Selfisness AynRand ideology ( http://bit.ly/mcCD2D )
And Democrats help conservatives when they function as policy wonks
talking policy without communicating the moral values behind the
policies. They help conservatives when they neglect to remind us that
pensions are deferred payments for work done. "Benefits" are pay for
work, not a handout. Pensions and benefits are arranged by contract.
If there is not enough money for them, it is because the contracted
funds have been taken by conservative officials and given to wealthy
people and corporations instead of to the people who have earned them.
Democrats help conservatives when they use conservative words like
"entitlements" instead of "earnings" and speak of government as
providing "services" instead of "necessities."
Is there hope?
I see it in Wisconsin, Ohio, Occupy where tens of thousands citizens see
through the conservative frames and are willing to flood the streets
of their capital to stand up for their rights. They understand that
democracy is about citizens uniting to take care of each other,
about social responsibility as well as individual responsibility,
and about work -- not just for your own profit, but to help create a
civilized society. They appreciate their teachers, nurses, firemen,
police, and other public servants, the unemployed, poor, disabled, sick.
They are flooding the streets to demand justice -- the justice of caring, of social
responsibility, and of excellence, where prosperity is to be shared
by those who work and those who serve.